Services / Software Development / Generative AI

Generative AI Development Services: practical GenAI, grounded in your data and your rules.

We build generative AI that cites its sources and respects your guardrails. The same foundations our agents are built on.

Talk to our team
Pakistan
UAE
USA / Pakistan
USA
UK
Pakistan
Qatar
Pakistan
UAE
Pakistan
UAE
Pakistan
UAE
Pakistan
Qatar
Pakistan
UAE
USA
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
UAE
USA / Pakistan
USA
UK
Pakistan
Qatar
Pakistan
UAE
Pakistan
UAE
Pakistan
UAE
Pakistan
Qatar
Pakistan
UAE
USA
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
USA
UK
Pakistan
UAE
Singapore
USA
USA / Pakistan
USA
Australia
USA
Denmark
USA
China
USA
Angola
USA
Pakistan
UAE
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
USA
UK
Pakistan
UAE
Singapore
USA
USA / Pakistan
USA
Australia
USA
Denmark
USA
China
USA
Angola
USA
Pakistan
UAE
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan

Pricing & timeline

What it costs and how long it takes.

AGS builds generative AI systems grounded in your own data: retrieval pipelines, LLM integrations, evaluation and fine-tuning where it is justified. Generative AI work is scoped and quoted per project, because cost depends on your data, your accuracy bar and your integrations. We confirm scope, timeline and price after a discovery conversation.

Fixed-price project

A defined scope, a set price and agreed deliverables. Best when the use case and data are already clear.

Quoted per project

Time & materials

Billed on the effort spent. Suited to exploratory work where evaluation results will shape the scope.

Quoted per project

Dedicated team

A standing team billed monthly, working as an extension of your own.

Quoted per project

Typical timeline

Timelines depend on the use case, data readiness and the accuracy bar you set. We confirm a timeline during discovery rather than quoting a number up front.

What moves the price

  • Quality and volume of your source data
  • Accuracy and citation requirements
  • Integrations with existing systems
  • Security, privacy and compliance constraints
  • Whether fine-tuning is needed beyond retrieval

We do not publish starting prices for generative AI work. Tell us the use case and we will confirm scope and a quote.

Our Methodology

Practical GenAI, delivered in four disciplined steps.

Discover

Identify where retrieval-grounded AI adds real value, not novelty.

Design & Build

Prompt engineering and RAG pipelines built around your own data.

Pilot & Verify

Output quality evaluated against your accuracy bar, not a demo.

Scale & Operate

Continuous evaluation as models and data change.

Proof, Not Promises

Real engagements, the results attached to each one.

Analyst time on false positives reduced by 45%

Managed service provider, Phoenix

Forecast error on promoted SKUs down 27% over the pilot

Mid-market snack manufacturer, Pennsylvania

Flagged 63% of eventual churners at least 60 days early

B2B telecoms reseller, Scotland

Changelog published within 2 hours of each release

Series B developer-tools company, Bay Area

What's Included

4 capabilities, one delivery team.

LLM Integration
Model selection and integration matched to your latency and cost needs.
RAG & Knowledge Systems
Retrieval pipelines that ground answers in your own documents and data.
Prompt Engineering & Evaluation
Systematic testing so outputs stay reliable as models change.
Custom Model Fine-Tuning
Domain-tuned models where off-the-shelf accuracy isn't enough.

The stack behind this service.

Real tools our team works in day to day, not a generic capability list.

Anthropic
LangChain
Hugging Face
Python

Ten industries. One audited standard.

Different regulations, different systems of record — the same discipline every time: agents that run inside guardrails and leave a record you can read.

View all industries →

Generative AI case studies

Challenge, solution, results. What we have shipped here.

Anonymised at the client's request. Each card states the pain point, what we built, and what changed. Plus the service type and country.

04 studies
AI MVPs USA

SOC alert triage assistant pilot for a Phoenix managed service provider

Managed service provider, Phoenix

Challenge
The provider's small security operations team received around 2,000 alerts a day across client tenants. Analysts spent most of each shift closing false positives, genuine alerts waited in the same queue, and the provider had lost two analysts to burnout in a year.
Solution
A nine-week MVP: an assistant enriches each alert with asset, user and threat-intelligence context, proposes a classification with its reasoning, and groups related alerts. Analysts accept or override every proposal; overrides are reviewed weekly to tune the rules. The assistant never closes an alert itself.
Results
  • Analyst time on false positives reduced by 45%
  • Median time to acknowledge a genuine alert down to 6 minutes
  • Pilot extended to all 14 client tenants
Service type · AI MVPsCountry · USA
AI MVPs USA

Demand-forecast MVP for a mid-market snack manufacturer

Mid-market snack manufacturer, Pennsylvania

Challenge
Weekly production planning was based on last year's volumes adjusted by gut feel, so the plant either ran short on promoted lines or built stock that expired in the warehouse. The planning team had retailer sell-through data but no practical way to combine it with promotion calendars.
Solution
Over nine weeks we built a forecasting MVP that joins retailer sell-through, the promotion calendar and weather history at SKU and depot level, then produces a weekly plan with a plain-language note explaining each significant change. Planners review and override before anything reaches the production schedule.
Results
  • Forecast error on promoted SKUs down 27% over the pilot
  • Write-offs from expired stock reduced by roughly $180k a year
  • Weekly planning meeting shortened from 3 hours to 45 minutes
Service type · AI MVPsCountry · USA
AI MVPs UK

Contract-renewal risk signals for a B2B telecoms reseller

B2B telecoms reseller, Scotland

Challenge
Account managers found out a business customer was leaving when the porting request arrived. Usage data, support tickets and invoice disputes lived in separate systems, and the quarterly retention review was a spreadsheet listing contracts by end date with no sense of which ones were actually at risk.
Solution
In a seven-week MVP we joined usage, ticket and billing data into a single view and built a scoring model with a short written rationale for each account flagged. Account managers get a weekly list of ten accounts to call, with suggested talking points drawn from that customer's own history.
Results
  • Flagged 63% of eventual churners at least 60 days early
  • Retention calls per account manager up from 4 to 15 a week
  • MVP delivered in 7 weeks on 2 years of historical data
Service type · AI MVPsCountry · UK
AI Agents USA

Release-notes and changelog agent for a developer-tools company

Series B developer-tools company, Bay Area

Challenge
The company shipped several times a day, but release notes were written by a product manager on Friday afternoons from a scroll through merged pull requests. Customer-facing notes regularly missed breaking changes, and the changelog was a week behind what was actually in production.
Solution
We built an agent that watches merged pull requests, groups them by feature area, drafts customer-facing notes in the company's style guide, and flags anything touching public APIs as a potential breaking change. A PM approves each draft in Slack before publication; every approval and edit is retained.
Results
  • Changelog published within 2 hours of each release
  • Breaking changes missed in notes down from 6 to 0 per quarter
  • Weekly release-notes effort cut from 4 hours to 30 minutes
Service type · AI AgentsCountry · USA

FAQ

Generative AI: questions, answered.

How much does generative AI development cost?

Generative AI projects are scoped and quoted individually. Cost depends on the quality and volume of your data, the accuracy and citation bar you need, integrations with existing systems, compliance constraints and whether fine-tuning is required beyond retrieval. We confirm scope, timeline and price after a discovery conversation.

What kind of generative AI does AGS build?

AGS builds practical generative AI grounded in your data and your rules. Systems that cite their sources and respect your guardrails. Work spans LLM integration matched to your latency and cost, RAG and knowledge systems, systematic prompt engineering and evaluation, and custom model fine-tuning where off-the-shelf accuracy isn't enough. These are the same foundations our agents are built on.

What is RAG and why does AGS use it?

RAG, or retrieval-augmented generation, grounds AI answers in your own documents and data instead of a model's generic training. AGS builds retrieval pipelines so outputs cite their sources and stay inside your guardrails. It is how we move GenAI past novelty to real value, and the same grounding underpins the autonomous agents we deploy.

How do you make sure generative AI outputs stay accurate?

We evaluate output quality against your accuracy bar, not a polished demo. Our four-step method builds RAG pipelines around your data, tests them systematically through prompt engineering and evaluation, then runs continuous evaluation as models and data change. That discipline keeps answers reliable long after launch, when models quietly shift underneath you.

When should we fine-tune a model instead of using RAG?

Fine-tune when off-the-shelf accuracy isn't enough for your domain. Specialised terminology, formats, or reasoning that retrieval alone can't reliably supply. AGS builds domain-tuned models for those cases, and often pairs them with RAG so answers stay grounded in current data. We start by identifying where each approach adds real value rather than defaulting to the heavier option.

Ground your GenAI in real data.

Tell us what you're building and we'll map the fastest path to it.

Let's talk